patching...
Breaking: VA GOP Nominates Ken Cuccinelli for Governor's Race »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Employee Complaints Led to Reston Zoo Search

Former worker told Fairfax County Animal Control that director "previously drowned other animals"

 

It was business as usual at the Reston Zoo on Monday, the day after Fairfax County Police announced the arrest of zoo director Meghan Mogensen. Groups of parents and preschoolers strolled the grounds, hoping to feed animals by hand and visit the petting barn.

Mogensen, of Silver Spring, MD, was at work at the zoo Monday, but she declined comment. On Friday, she was charged with a count of animal cruelty and possession of a controlled substance in relation to the death of a wallaby on the premises last winter.

Mogensen is not registered as a veterinarian with the Virginia Board of Veterinary Medicine.

The zoo's owner, Eric Mogensen, Meghan's father, did not return phone calls. Eric Mogensen also owns the Virginia Safari Park in Natural Bridge and the Gulf Breeze Zoo in Gulf Breeze, FL.

Eric Mogensen is the former owner of the Zoological Animal Exchange, which delivered exotic animals to zoos nationwide. In 1990, Zoological Animal Exchange was the subject of a complaint by the Humane Society of the United States after four animals — a fishing cat, a sloth bear and two palm civits — died of dehydration in transport to the San Diego Zoo, the LA Times reported.

Steve Feldman, spokesman for the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, said there are more than 2,500 businesses licensed to display wildlife in the U.S. The Reston Zoo has a USDA license. Those businesses must abide by the Animal Welfare Act.

Feldman said 214 facilities are accredited by the AZA. Those facilities must meet the AZA's independent animal care standards. The Reston Zoo is not AZA accredited and has never applied for accreditation, he said.

Meghan Mogensen's arrest was made after a lengthy investigation, which remains ongoing, police said. Here is the series of events that led to the investigation by a Fairfax County Animal Control officer, according to the Feb. 16 search warrant.

*A zoo employee contacted animal control the week of Jan. 26. The employee had captured the injured wallaby, placed it in a crate, examined it, notified the zoo director and recommended the wallaby be seen for treatment by a licensed veterinarian. The warrant did not specify the nature of the injury.

*The zoo director contacted the corporate director of the facility and the decision was made to euthanize the animal.

*The employee briefly left the grounds, but asked the whereabouts of the injured wallaby upon returning. The employee was told the animal's crate was last seen being carried by Mogensen toward one of the barns.

*When the employee found the crate, it was empty and sitting next to a water spigot and a 5-gallon bucket containing water. The employee told police "the director has a past history of drowning animals."

*The employee jumped in a nearby dumpster and found a trash bag containing the dead, wet wallaby.

*The employee then confronted the director and resigned.

*Animal Control then met with Mogensen, who told them she humanely euthanied the wallaby (by IV injection into the jugular vein) with a drug called Beuthanasia. She told officers the wallaby was wet because they routinely wash the animal bodies.

*Animal Control asked for the zoo's USDA permit (which they had) and the DEA permit, which they did not possess, saying drugs were dispensed by their contracted vet.

*Animal Control then checked with the Virginia Department of Agricultural and Consumer Services, which told them the zoo is not permitted to perform euthanasia as it has not completed the "required protocol, training and certification required by the state veterinarian."

* Animal Control also interviwed another employee who worked at the zoo from May 2010 to May 2011. That employee told officers the drug Ketamine was kept on the premises (also without a DEA permit). The employee also told officers they had knowledge of "the zoo director having previously drowned other animals."

Police took several boxes of drugs, files and a drug log book as part of the search warrant.

Keep up with news from Reston Patch by subscribing to our free daily newsletter and following us on Facebook and Twitter.

Related Topics: Meghan Mogensen, reston zoo, and wallaby

Scott

4:53 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

She washed the animal to toss it into a dumpster? YEAH RIGHT!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Molly Smith

7:38 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

I know, how stupid is that? UGH

Skipper L.

5:48 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

This is quite a story. The Director is the daughter of the owner; imagine that. This lady comes across as a fine piece of work. Seems like as if she does not like something or something may cause her a problem;, she just unilaterally gets rid of it. A lot of self-induced jusrisdiction for an administratior of sorts. They might do well to close this facility, get rid of her and save the animals; It seems the animals only chance of survival.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scott

6:55 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Skipper agree - I am thinking it is all about $$ not animal welfare - however I take great satisfaction that Karen got her Mug Shot!!! That made my day!!!

Also superb report Karen big pat on the back as you take a lot of sh*t from others!!

Nick

9:12 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

OK, at the risk of setting of a debate: let's not jump to conclusions, shall we? We do not know the nature of the injury. If the wallaby was indeed hurt or dying, it may have been the humane thing to do. Also, point of discussion here is IF SHE HAD A LICENSE. Not if she should or should not have killed the animal. If she would have had the training, she would have done the same thing and all would be fine. Finally, from some googling on the name of the lady, she actually does seem like a nice enough person with a good heart for animals and animal welfare. I'm sure the zoo is operating on a very narrow margin, so that may put some pressure on people to cut cost, and from the article above it feels as if there are some hostilities among people at the zoo. That generally breeds very unreliable reporting.. So, this may very well be a case of blatant cruelty, but as long as we don't know, an open mind will serve everyone best. You know, innocent until PROVEN guilty (in court, not by some website, that is)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scott

9:57 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Nick - With licensing comes education - I know some 300K dollars later. The bottom line is only a Licensed Vet should make the call on the animals well being not administration. If they are operating on marginal lines then they should be shut down. For God Sakes if the case is such of paying a vet bill then they have a huge issue and the care of the animals is beyond what they can deliver to include but not limited to food!!!

I hope that she pays a VERY high price if guilty. Also sham on us would be the case i we did not speak up! Our admission supported this behavior and I for one will be the first to support the closure and or sale to a company that can afford a 100.00 vet visit. Lastly, we do not know how sick or injured the poor animal was; but regardless drowning is a very painful death! I do not believe for a moment she injected the animal moreover she drowned it!

Comment_arrow

Pua Kealoha

10:46 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Nick, she was no more qualified to humanely euthanize that animal than I am ... the animals at the Reston Zoo must be examined by vets .... not by zoo directors. She is not a veterinarian. We are not "jumping" to a conclusion here; this is a fact. No animal deserves to be murdered by drowning .... there is nothing humane, nothing compassionate, about drowning a living creature struggling to survive.

Comment_arrow

Levi Wallach

10:54 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Nick, while I agree with you that she's innocent until proven guilty, that's in a court, and luckily commenters on a news sight do not have to uphold quite that high a standard. Not that we shouldn't try. ;-) But I think speculation is fine up to a point. There's a lot of fishy things going on that have been reported, and the police have charged her, so all of these items make it pretty hard to presume innocense without additional information. We're not responsible for making this determination, a jury is, so we can speculate and it will not effect this woman's case.

Regarding the zoo having a narrow margin, that is something YOU are completely speculating about, no? We have no idea. And even if it was, what does that justify? Killing animals because treating them is more expensive? Owners of pets have the right to make such decisions, but zookeepers do not, as far as I know. I've personally been to the Reston zoo on a number of occasions and have generally enjoyed myself and have never seen anything indicating any malfeasance. But the entrence fee is quite pricey. If they do have a very narrow profit margin, they are doing something wrong, because they certainly charge enough to make a healthy profit. Could be that there are inherent costs involved that make it very difficult even so. But I guess this makes me wonder whether this means we need to consider whether or not to allow these kinds of zoos to exist at all...

Stella McEnearny

8:12 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

There ought to be particularly harsh punishments for animal abusers and killers.

Reply

M. Bono

10:17 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I almost drowned in a swimming pool when I was young. It was the most terrifying experience I have ever had. I cannot imagine that poor animal struggling for it's life as water filled it's lungs. If it is determined she did this - I hope they give her the maximum sentence....

Reply

Bob Myers

9:56 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

We should be thankful for the employee who stood up for the wallaby. Any kind of abuse is wrong. I doubt anyone standing behind the pet farm will ever see this act as wrong. I want to thank Fairfax County for the work on this case. Animals haven't a voice. We must be the voice to protect them to humane standards.

Reply

Derek

10:38 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012

You are all worked up about this misdemeanor account, but I'll bet you still eat hamburgers or at least bacon for breakfast. By vegan standards EVERYONE is inhumane by eating and perpetuating the cycle of killing animals for food. Whats the maximum sentence for being responsible for that? If you care- Go vegan or stop complaining.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Levi Wallach

10:50 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012

LOL, spoken like a true Vegan extremist. IE, only the totally "pure" have a right to speak. Without adhering to their strict doctrine of eating, you have no right to feel compassion for other animals, because if you eat meat you are a hiporcrit. This ignores the millions of gray shades between treating animals horribly, and treating them well, because to Vegans, it's all for our benefit regardless, which of course, is total BS, but that's just one omnivore's opinion, and as such probably completely worthless to this ideologue... Must be fun seeing the world in such black and white tones.

Leave a comment