patching...
Breaking: VA GOP Nominates Ken Cuccinelli for Governor's Race »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Letter to the Editor: New Online Math Program 'A Model for a 21st Century Disaster'

Leader of Fairfax County Federation of Teachers says lack of discussion before textbook program came to fruition has resulted in no buy-in, issues of access and equity.

 

To the Editor:

There is a new math ‘series’ that is being implemented in Fairfax County Public Schools, currently. It is an online disaster that could have been avoided.

Let’s reflect upon how this happened: Right after the FCPS School Board approved the FY 2013 budget (which was ‘tight’ due to revenue problems), the superintendent dropped a $7.7 million bill on their laps at the FY 2012 budget review, announcing that $10 million dollars was now available from the previous year. Later, it was discovered that FCPS administration had the nerve to sign the contract for the math series before the school board even approved the money for it.

The fact that the new math series was to be primarily an online resource (vs. the more ‘traditional’ approach) was never emphasized.

Although upper elementary and middle school got online texts for some of their social studies classes last year, with enhanced pdf files embedded in ineffective interfaces (that both teachers and students found difficult to use) FCPS still moved to the online math books which include a combination of Flash, pdf, and web-based materials.

The books are online and cannot be put on a stand-alone reader, which means they won’t work on the most affordable devices available like Kindles and Nooks. The materials are inaccessible in places without an internet connection, and difficult to use in homes with multiple people all trying to access a single machine.

There’s the matter of the Flash and Java-based content which isn’t playable on iOS devices and, it turns out, is inconsistently supported on Android devices running a variety of different versions of the OS.

Neither the parents, community, principals, nor teachers were genuinely consulted on this before upper administration made the decision. There was no effective pilot run on the program. None of the stakeholders had any buy-in, nor were any comprehensive steps taken to discuss this with them beforehand. The workforce was given no training. Parents were not aware of the online impact. Principals were not given proper support. There are issues of access, equity, and instructional effectiveness in schools that were never considered or addressed.

There have been stories of parents having to spend upwards of $100 on hardbound copies of the books.

This is about upper level administrators recklessly attempting to look progressive, jeopardizing the quality of our children's education. In my opinion, it reflects incompetence at the highest levels and gross professional malpractice. Those in FCPS leadership who are responsible for this mess should be replaced.

‘Just give us some more money and we can fix the problem’. That’s their answer. The current administration just wasted $7.7 million … remember? How arrogant!

In the meantime our principals, teachers, parents and students are left ‘holding the bag’ to ‘just deal with it’.

Under NO circumstances should the school board allocate ANY new money for math until a new superintendent and administration are seated. The community and teachers should be engaged NOW to ascertain what needs to be done to fix this.

It would assist us all greatly if the current school board would defer from ‘rubber stamping’ any new programs, initiatives, or money requests for ‘projects’ that come from the current administration (I would like to publicly recognize Patty Reed and Megan McLaughlin’s attempts to address this over the past month with FCPS staff; their efforts have been met with the usual amount of resistance).  

It’s time for the parents and teachers of FCPS to take back our schools, for the good of our children. We will all need to work together to clean up this mess.

FCFT had a survey of their members (on this issue and others) that closed on November 2nd. The results are posted on the home page of our web site at www.fcft.org.

Parents and teachers are the true educators, and know best. We will all need to be more assertive. Your teachers care!

If you have comments, concerns or questions about the new math online (or any other issue), I encourage you to contact your school board members at schoolboardmembers@fcps.edu

 Your voice matters (and thank you)!

Steven L. Greenburg
President, Fairfax County Federation of Teachers
AFT / AFL-CIO #2401

Related Topics: Fairfax County Federation of Teachers, Fairfax County Public Schools, Fairfax County School Board, and Online Textbooks

Michele

8:51 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I am extremely disappointed to hear about such a poor choice! I home school my son now, and have found fantastic online resources that are also used by school systems across the country, and many are FREE!! My son did a year's worth of Algebra I on Khan academy in just a few months, and understood it better than having 1 1/2 years of it in school.... That is just one of hundreds of free resources out there. Maybe the school board needs to do some homework before making such commitments in the future.

Reply

John Farrell

9:02 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Just 234 days left, Steve

until we have a Superintendent worthy of the entire student body, teachers, parents and teachers of Fairfax. Hang in there. It gets better.

Reply

janet otersen

9:43 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I think what bothers me the most about this decision is that the Superintendent rushed this thru after the budget was already approved. Did they not know they needed math textbooks? They claim they haven't bought math books for over 10 years-- and there was no set aside in the budget discussions--seriously? $2.2 billion and we couldn't find $10 million for textbooks?? Incredible.

It would also have been nice if staff mentioned to all those hard working volunteers on the math textbook committee that they were going to be purchasing online textbooks. Did they not know or did they deliberately withhold this information from the committee? I'm thinking they deliberately didn't tell them.

I am sick and tired of these decsions being made without asking stakeholders. Teachers know better than anyone if online textbooks would work. Parents would like to be kept in the loop as well. Oh, yea, and how about ask the kids??? Maybe a pilot program in a few schools?

School Board members need to be a little more street smart when these rushed decisions are thrust on them. The budget discussion begins in November and is usually finalized in April--that is SIX MONTHS--which is plenty of time to talk about $10 million purchases. We expect more from our leadership.

Reply

Sandra

9:43 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I have the same problems the author noted above regarding online texts. They are harder on the eyes, and reading that much from an electronic screen can cause headaches and eyestrain. Also, because they require internet access, it means kids can only study from a place where the internet is available. The nice thing about a textbook is that it can be taken along to a soccer tournament, a swim meet, a track meet, etc. and students can study in between matches or while waiting for their event. Textbooks can be read in a car, while waiting in an airport when on vacation, etc. It would be better if electronic texts could be downloaded to a Kindle or Nook, but I think the small screen would require restructuring of how the text is presented. Overall, I agree that electronic texts are a poor choice for FCPS right now. They need to do more research before subjecting students and teachers to it.

Reply

KH

10:03 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

I have difficulty with computer sharing for three children from an affluent family with 2 computers trying to each get their time on the computer for homework and can't imagine how challenging it is for larger families with only one (or no) reliable computer in the home. We learned that borrowing a hard copy of the book was an option at BTSN but there weren't enough for everyone. I will write to the SB.

Reply

JD

11:01 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Actually, parents can spend over $100 to purchase the hardcopy version of the math textbook. The precalculus textbook used in my son's math class, ISBN 9780076602186 cost $150 or more if I were to purchase myself.

Reply

L Pentek

11:17 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Kudos to Mr. Greenburg for calling for accountability applied to the decision makers in the FCPS administration it is about time that type of standard was used. Kudos also to Board members Patty Reed and Megan McLaughlin for stepping up. They should ensure this textbook fiasco is addressed timely and effectively, and continue by keeping FCPS management accountable on all topics including facilities.

Reply

Mark Carolla

11:33 am on Thursday, November 8, 2012

Having taught college courses online to adult students I am hardly a Luddite when it comes to online education. However, this move by the FCPS is political-educational correctness run amuk. I come from a family of educators and strongly support teachers but believe this evolving fiasco indicates a top-heavy administrative tail in the FCPS hierarchy that needs to be sent back to the classroom - if they have actual teaching skills rather than being steeped in management and "learning delivery" theories. Previous commentators have listed all of the technical reasons why this idea was poorly thought out. However there is indeed an entire industry and lobby out there insisting that education must be digitized, and basically eliminate the teacher as an intermediary - education is seen merely as a product to be delivered. There are still plenty of places where the interenet is not available and students - even college graduate students - often need to have a real book to carry around with them. This internet access issue one would think is even more critical in school districts subjected to week long electric power and FIOS and other ISP disruptions. As for the usefulness of internet media for home schooling; it could be argued by some as akin to that of representing one's self in court. "He or she that teaches one's own kids has a fool for a client." My certified teacher parents would never have dreamed of "doing this at home" in fields they weren't accredited in.

Reply

JO

2:55 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

The unfortunate problem is you likely have non technical administrators making technical decisions and they have not even thought about consulting the IT staff within the county or the schools.The school board knew all too well when they did not place the order for paper textbooks that this unguided missile was being launched, however, all indications is nobody within FCPS even gave a second thought to informing staff, parents and students as to what this year would bring. Since there are multiple publishers, finding the proper web links for the online textbooks is a chore at times. There is no "universal" username and password for each student. They likely have different account credentials for each publisher. I do a lot of home networking and many families that were no where near prepared for this major change. With household of multiple students, many families did not have the resources for their students to be online simultaneously. I had families that had to rush out and buy additional computers, families where parents were coming home from work with their company laptop so their children could do homework. Then not to mention all the problems with teachers not having consistent Blackboard portals with links to the online books, the school websites not having links for the textbooks when Blackboard is down. Even situations where the publishers of all people chose to perform maintenance on the web servers on the weekend when kids likely needed to access the book most!

Reply

jomarsh124

9:58 pm on Thursday, November 8, 2012

The online text for Algebra II is horrible. Whoever bought it obviously never tried to use it.

I ended up buying a hard copy for my daughter. Cost about $90 including delivery.

The hard copy textbook is ISBN 013253102X
Parents may call 1-800-848-9500 to order a hard copy directly from Pearson.

Reply

Laura B.

8:21 am on Friday, November 9, 2012

Nobody seems to mention my biggest concern -- if a student is online he or she is inevitably multitasking and distracted. It is impossible to prevent this if a student is sitting in front of the computer. I would like virtually ALL schoolwork to be AWAY FROM THE COMPUTER.

Reply

m bollinger

1:04 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

We voiced our concern to School Board Member Jane Strauss who said, among other things, that "it is more important than ever that students learn to efficiently navigate the online world." Was she kidding? Teenagers need more time "navigating the online world"? We don't think she's spent much time with any if she believes that. Technology is great, and a sophisticated on-line platform might be appropriate where competent professionals have actually thought through how it would work. But here we had a bunch of out-of-touch bureaucrats ratifying an expensive decision to purchase a wildly inadequate system, and it's the teachers and the kids who are paying the price. In addition to what others here have said - limited number of compatible devices; problems with several children in a family needing the same resource at the same time; eyestrain; inability to do homework in any place but in front of the computer; distraction of trying to do homework with social media a click away; power outages; pages that won't load; on and on - there is as well the great economic inequity to this. Families who can will buy their way out of this mess. But for the kids for whom this isn't an option, it is deeply unfair and antithetical to everything public education is supposed to stand for. Oh, and one final note -- it appears one school has stood firm against this nonsense: TJHSST. Yes, the flagship tech school. Now, what does that tell us?

Reply

Dale Sux

6:01 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

I was a teacher who participated in the online textbook "pilot." Not one high school or middle school teacher recommended the online social studies books. We were dismayed to learn that we weren't testing anything. The books were purchased! We weren't piloting anything. We were giving free advice to McDougal Little on things they needed to fix such as including Dec 7th on their timeline! Most social studies teachers don't even use the book because it's user-UNfriendly. Teachers manage student accounts.I have 7 students who have signed up twice for the textbook due to confusing sign-ons. I have never been taught how to delete these accounts so the county is being double charged. Last year, this kid in our soccer carpool was bragging that he is the only one in his AP History class getting an "A" because his dad argued for a hard copy of his book. He said no one else was gettiing their reading done, but he was because he could open his text book anywhere, anytime. Imagine that! I'd like to see Jack Dale read the online history textbook and like it!

Reply

Matt McKnight

10:29 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

Wow, there is so much stuff online- and so many great ways to do this. Which product line did they choose? It would be a lot more effective of a message if I could see exactly what it was that they bought.

Reply

Matt McKnight

10:49 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

I clicked on that, but couldn't see where it identified which DRM overloaded thing we paid for. I was able to find it here http://www.fcps.edu/is/textbooks/onlinetextbooks/index.shtml

Reply

Leave a comment