.

State of the Union: Congressman Gerry Connolly Weighs In on Income Inequality

President Obama focused Tuesday night on closing the "income inequality" gap in his annual State of the Union address.

Northern Virginia Congressman Gerry Connolly, a Democrat represents the 11th congressional District. Official photo
Northern Virginia Congressman Gerry Connolly, a Democrat represents the 11th congressional District. Official photo

(Editor's note: Northern Virginia Congressman Gerry Connolly, a Democrat who represents the 11th congressional District, issued a statement on income equality in the United States in anticipation of President Obama’s State of the Union Address Tuesday night.)

“Since the 1970s, American workers have seen their wages fall or stagnate. The wealthiest Americans’ incomes have increased fourfold. Even after 40 years of economic growth, today’s generation takes home less than our grandparents and high-school graduates make 40 percent less than their predecessors did four decades ago.

“This problem ought to elicit bipartisan concern, yet many of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle have shown little interest in the consequences of our country becoming so sharply divided by wealth. For many of my Republican colleagues, even talking about wealth and income inequality is uncomfortable. It’s time to realize all too many Americans – hardworking Americans – are falling behind.

“From 1979–2007, wages for the top 1 percent of wage earners grew 156 percent, while the bottom 90 percent saw only a 17 percent increase. Since 1983, nearly 75 percent of the growth in wealth has been captured by the top 5 percent, while the bottom 60 percent actually suffered a decline. By 2010, nearly all middle and low-income families made the same hourly wage that they did in 2000, despite having raised productivity by 22 percent. Worse, median family income was 6 percent lower.

“But this lost decade only caps a trend of declining wage growth that began in 1979.

“In what may be the most telling portrait of how middle and low-income Americans are being shut out of the new economy, Bloomberg Business recently reported that 95 percent of wealth generated in the post-financial-crash era went to the richest 1 percent. In real terms, 9 out of 10 people control less wealth than they did before the financial crash. In 2012, the top 10 percent of earners took home more than half of the U.S.’s total income in 2012. This is the highest level ever recorded. Income and wealth haven’t been this concentrated since before the Great Depression, and it’s likely that soon we will eclipse even the Gilded Age.

“A recent Gallup poll shows that concerns about inequality have moved beyond academia and into public consciousness. According to Gallup, 2 out of 3 Americans are dissatisfied with income and wealth distribution in the U.S. – including 54 percent of Republicans and 70 percent of independents. This same poll found that many Americans now worry about their ability to find future opportunities, and only 54 percent believe that one can get ahead by working hard. What does this say about the American Dream?

“Louis Brandeis warned, “We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." Letting a generation of Americans remain underemployed, under-paid, and despairing of a bleak future creates a dangerous cycle of economic and social destruction.

“Nations whose citizens believe that the game is rigged against them are not beacons of democracy. Civic culture corrodes and space opens for divisive and extreme politics. Pope Francis recently lamented that the world’s inequality is quietly undermining our social and political institutions.

“Tonight, the President, will highlight how our nation’s wealth and income gaps have become too large to continue to ignore. Congress cannot continue to stand idly.

“I urge my colleagues to consider the many bipartisan proposals that would jumpstart job growth for ALL Americans. We need to be investing in this country’s crumbling infrastructure. My own Put America Back to Work Act – which would reauthorize the Build America Bonds program and give our local governments another tool to jumpstart infrastructure projects – is one of many measures that would create immediate work for many of the underemployed in this country.

“Generations of Americans, starting with our Founders, made their way to America’s shores attracted by the promise of opportunity and the belief that through hard work they could build a better life for themselves and their families.

“Unfortunately, the American Dream is becoming further out of reach for more Americans, and Congress is not helping matters. I urge my colleagues to join me in preserving opportunity for ALL Americans and to preventing our nation from becoming one of haves and have-nots.”

 

Erik Kengaard January 29, 2014 at 03:40 PM
" . . . proposals that would jumpstart job growth for ALL Americans?" How about stopping the importation of workers? Don't we have a surplus as it is? Ask Gerry Connolly why he supports importing tens of millions of additional workers over the next decade, when we aren't able to provide employment for millions we already have? Nothing has done more to diminish the quality of life for the middle class through higher housing (land) costs, competition for jobs, greater poverty, mortgage fraud, medicare fraud, crime, cost of public schools, cost of college, depletion of resources, burden on the taxpayer and overall congestion than the increase of and change in population since 1965, driven almost entirely by immigration. Because we are overpopulated, millions of young people graduating this year will never be able to buy a home in the town where they were born. What sort of person wishes for that? Re housing costs, see report by the Americas Society/Council of the Americas and the Partnership for a New American Economy (Jacob L. Vigdor) in which he claims that more than 40 million immigrants currently in the united states have increased housing prices nationwide by $3.7 trillion. The high price of housing is a major factor in poorer quality of life for the middle class and the poor. Population density is the main driver of the price of land, and thus the price (and quality) of housing. High immigration is the main driver of population density.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something