.
Feedback

By The Numbers: FCPS Proposed FY 2013 Budget

A breakdown of Superintendent Jack Dale's $2.4 billion proposal

Superintendent Jack Dale a proposal 9 percent larger than the budget for 2012.

The increase, which amounts to $202.3 million, is driven largely by an estimated enrollment growth of 4,000 students, and the estimated 721 teaching positions needed to accommodate them.

Dale also proposed a 2 percent market scale adjustment for all employees, along with step increase for eligible employees.

Here's a look at how his plan breaks down:

The plan calls for a $2.4 billion operating budget

  • Nearly 86 percent, $2.1 billion, goes toward instruction costs
  • $132.1 million goes toward transportation, including bus driver salaries, replacement buses and bus operations and maintenance
  • $100.8 million goes toward facilities management (maintenance of school buildings and equipment)
  • $111.3 million goes toward "general support" (finance, human resources, information technology, purchasing, leadership team)

FY 2013 Proposed Revenue:

 

Change

Percent Change

County Transfer

$135.8 million

8.4%

State Aid

$24.9 million

7.8%

Sales Tax

$4 million

2.6%

Federal Aid

-$21.8 million

-34.5%

Other

$1.4

2.6%

Budgeted beginning balance

$0.2

0.3%

Student Costs:

  • Enrollment Increases: $45.7 million
  • Two new schools, at the South County and Lacey sites: $1.9 million
  • Reintroducing "Extended Learning Time" (summer school) for students: $5 million
  • Adding Foreign Languages in the Elementary Schools (FLES) program to eight new schools, Foreign Language Immersion Program in two others: $0.9 million
  • College Success Program: $0.1 million
  • Teacher-in-residence at the Udvar Hazy Center: $0.1 million

Staff Costs

  • Extended time for teachers (measuring and compensating for professional learning communities, working with colleagues to improve curriculum and grading practices, etc.): $3.3 million
  • Staffing reserve (additional positions to address large class sizes): $2 million
  • Tuition reimbursement: $1.2 million
  • Electronic Curriculum Assessment Resource Tool(eCart): $0.3 million

Staff Compensation Costs

  • Two percent market scale adjustment for all employees: $36.6 million
  • Step increases for eligible employees: $42 million (offset by retirement and departure savings of $38.2 million)
  • Custodial salary adjustment to 1,300 custodians: $0.4 million
  • Retirement Rate increases: $66.3 million
  • Health and life insurance rate increases:$8.9 million
  • Benefits for parent liaisons and multilingual interpreters: $2.0 million

Other:

  • Network replacement equipment: $4 million
  • Equipment replacement: $3 million
  • Preventative maintenance: $2 million
  • Service contracts and custodial supplies: $1.7 million
  • Building leases: $1 million
  • Finance technician contract length: $0.5 million
Samantha Nims January 16, 2012 at 05:20 pm
I am a Fairfax County teacher. I have a master's degree in education, three endorsements on my license, and I am Highly Qualified to teach in an additional subject area. My social security is deducted from my paycheck, as is my mandatory retirement account contribution. My annual salary is paid over 12 months. I receive benefits through my spouse, whose employer offers more competitive pricing. I am fortunate enough to have a spouse who earns a salary that allows us to live in Fairfax County. This means I am one of the taxpayers who pays my exorbitant salary. If my spouse were to become unemployed, our children would qualify for free lunch - based on my salary. I spent my 1% cost-of-living salary increase on educational posters, organizational systems, and additional supplies for my classroom within the first month of school. I have attended training, taken classes, or pursued additional certification during my eight weeks of summer vacation every summer for the past six years. I have twice the number of points I need to renew my license and have only accumulated a few credits toward a salary increase; I chose to spend this time to improve my skills both in and out of the classroom.
This is what Fairfax County teachers do - with few exceptions. Some of the finest teachers I know are struggling to make ends meet, and may have to leave the profession, because we are so overpaid. $86,000? Sure - if I earn 30 more graduate credits...and work 22 more years.
Frank Sogandares January 16, 2012 at 05:33 pm
I understand that some teachers may be paid more than you think worthwhile. I have no opinion as to the accuracy of this since i find this analysis/discussion to be superficial and therefore deeply flawed.
Samantha Nims January 16, 2012 at 05:34 pm
Teaching is not a profession one enters for the money, the benefits, the summer vacation, or the accolades. Teaching is for those who wish to invest their time and share their knowledge with others in the hope that they might awaken a lifelong love of learning. In a world in which professional athletes don't play until they receive millions of dollars, is it wrong to pay teachers a salary commensurate with the cost of living in the area in which they teach?
Amelie Krikorian January 16, 2012 at 06:20 pm
There's also the homeless clause, where children can't be denied education even if they have no declared residence. Plus, if you are a teacher having to live in Loudoun or Prince William, you can have your child educated in FCPS if you teach there. And I have no idea why people think teachers make 86k per year: that's a high school principal's salary, not a teacher's salary. Where I work, there are special ed teachers with master's degrees earning 50k after working 20 years. As far as 100% benefits... not at all. The county matches us for the 5% of our income we put into retirement; we have a subsidized health insurance but no more than any other business employee would. I think Blue Cross is something like $200-$300 per month for a family. My dental insurance is $25 a month, but it doesn't pay for everything by any means.
Amelie Krikorian January 16, 2012 at 06:21 pm
Right on, Samantha! I wonder why so many people who have never taught think they know everything about our profession! They would be highly insulted if we chose to criticize their work based on an outsider's view.
Rob Jackson January 16, 2012 at 06:56 pm
There is a difference between an agreement with teachers living in a nearby county that permits their children to attend FCPS or a policy that educates homeless children and allowing children who live in other counties, cities, states or the District of Columbia to attend FCPS without tuition. FCPS says it checks residence, but how well does it? The County is going to face severe reductions in tax dollars as federal contracting shrinks. It needs to make sure that it is not educating the children of non-residents unless otherwise specifically permitted. The School Board should audit FCPS' performance here.
Kathy Keith January 16, 2012 at 07:12 pm
Amelie,
I don't understand how a teacher with a Master's and 20 years experience is making only 50K. I just looked at the salary schedule on FCPS and the starting salary for a teacher with a Master's is right at $50,000--a teacher with 20 years experience should be making in the 70's. I do understand the concerns about the pay, however, I think teachers also need to realize that there are many starting salaries--even for college graduates -that are not as good as those teachers are making. I say this is a person who taught for a number of years. I agree that teachers work very, very hard. They also earn every penny they make. It is a tough job. From my point of view, FCPS is not spending and allotting the money properly. I think far too much is staying at Gatehouse. No matter how much "assistance" and "support" is offered at Gatehouse, the teaching and learning happen in the classroom. The instructional support at Gatehouse are mostly justifying their jobs by requiring paperwork from teachers. Put the teachers in the classroom.
Uncle Smartypants January 16, 2012 at 08:53 pm
I don't understand why parents don't pay a higher share of their children's education. No one forced them to have children. I am childfree and I've been paying personal property and real estate taxes in this county since 1977 and roughly 2/3 of that money has gone to educate other people's children. That's a lot of money over the years. And yet parents think it is money they are entitled to. I don't mind kicking in a good hunk - let's say 1/3 of my taxes, but parents should pay some kind of surcharge for each of their spawn in the school system, so taxes on the childfree can be reduced and more fairly reflect the burden they place on county government. If my real estate taxes were reduced by a third every year, Aunt Smartypants and I could spend an extra week in Europe every summer.
Amelie Krikorian January 16, 2012 at 09:21 pm
People without children are a burden on the system later in life. Without kids to help in the support and care of the elderly, they are a heavier burden on Medicare etc. We have an elderly couple next door to us who would have been in assisted living years ago if not for the help of their children, who buy their groceries, drive them to doctor's appointments and clean their houses. Plus, a good school system helps your house appreciate in value, which you will benefit from when you sell it. I'm not saying there isn't validity to your argument, because it must seem like you're paying for something you don't benefit from. However, our kids are the ones who will hopefully cure cancer and fix the deficit, among other things. And your taxes go for a lot more than the schools!
Amelie Krikorian January 16, 2012 at 09:21 pm
I agree, but how do you propose the schools check residency? Go to every home and see if the child in question lives there? There are so many privacy laws in place that we can't even ask if the child is here illegally or not. We have a LOT more children of illegal immigrants benefiting from the Fairfax County School system than we have children of other counties -- who at least are paying taxes to the US. I know people lie to get their kids into better schools, and I know that the voucher system is backfiring because people are using that as a means of getting out of the bad school they are districted into and overcrowding the good ones... but without a house to house search, there isn't much we can do about it.
Amelie Krikorian January 16, 2012 at 09:28 pm
Those step increases are not necessarily being given every year. A teacher coming in with a master's and 20 years' experience teaching elsewhere is more likely to be making that quoted salary that someone who has been here all along, although sometimes the school district will pull some pranks like refusing to honor another state's master's degree -- which is probably what happened to the teacher I am thinking of, since she started teaching in another state.
For those of you wondering where the numbers are coming from, look at http://www.fcps.edu/employment/. According to that, master's plus 20 years ought to be making somewhere in the 70ks, but I know for a fact many are not. And those of you who think this is a lot of money -- the median income in Fairfax is over $100k, and the average home costs over $400k. You cannot buy a home worth more than three times your income without a significant downpayment, which is why teachers can't afford to live here. http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/demogrph/gendemo.htm#inc
patchfan January 16, 2012 at 11:24 pm
You really need to factor in retirement benefits to calculate the salary of teachers. A defined benefit plan promises you a set amount each year. Unlike the rest of us smucks, they don't just get back what they put in. Add retired health benefits to that and the number soars. The real kicker? They get full retirement after 30 years of service. We, as taxpayers, could be paying their retirement for 30+ years after they have retired. There aren't too many professions out there that promise you that. Its a pay me now or pay me later deal. And not a bad one at that.
Ellen January 17, 2012 at 01:42 am
Best response yet!
Ellen January 17, 2012 at 01:49 am
Amelie, $200-$300 per month for health insurance (BCBS) is quite the deal!! Imagine how much you would have to pay per month if you weren't receiving this benefit.
Jonathan Erickson January 17, 2012 at 02:58 am
Verrrry interesting!!!!!
Susan Larson (Editor) January 17, 2012 at 03:14 am
Adding to the discussion: Fairfax County voters approved a $252.75 million school bond referendum in November 2011, and another $232.58 million school bond was approved by voters in 2009. This in addition to the FCPS Proposed FY 2013 Budget. Comments? http://patch.com/A-mx7Q
Erica R. Hendry (Editor) January 17, 2012 at 04:26 am
To clarify, capital improvements aren't funded through the school system's operating budget. They're funded through bonds (borrowing), which voters either approve or reject at the polls.
I just wanted to make sure nobody gets the wrong impression: While CIPs are funded by taxpayer money, it is a separate pool of money than the fiscal year budget.
Rob Jackson January 17, 2012 at 12:30 pm
Amelie - We aren't talking about children of illegal immigrants. The law says we must educate everyone living in Fairfax County. We are talking about people who live in D.C., Maryland, or anywhere outside Fairfax County and are illegally sending their kids to FCPS without paying tuition. People registering their children must provide proof of residence. We need to audit that - followup on a statistically valid sample to see whether the proof is valid. Just knowing that an audit is being conducted will cause people to pull their kids out of FCPS and send them to schools where they live.
Rob Jackson January 17, 2012 at 12:31 pm
Erica, you are right about the bonds. But service on the debt, both interest and payback of principle, come from taxpayers.
Jonathan Erickson January 17, 2012 at 12:42 pm
So a teacher work 3/4's of the year and retires after 30 years. Comes to 22 and 1/2 years of actual work whereas Joe the plumber works until he is 65 or 45 years. Therefor Joe is twice the asset to society that a teacher is?
Kim January 17, 2012 at 01:35 pm
Maybe Joe should have gone to college and become a teacher. Do you hate doctors, too, because they make more than you, or are they okay because you think they're not funded by your taxes? What about road crews, trash collectors, police and fire department personnel? Librarians? Their salaries are paid by our taxes.
Kim January 17, 2012 at 03:32 pm
There has been a lot of discussion on the topic of teacher salaries. I am curious. Given that we taxpayers pay teacher salaries, what do you think is a fair starting salary for a teacher? What about a teacher with 20 years experience? Or should all schools be private, funded by parents? And then what do we do about the requirement that children go to school? Does the government force parents to pay to educate their children even if they don't want to or can't afford it?
Jonathan Erickson January 17, 2012 at 05:52 pm
Yo Kim! I hate waste be it by the President of the USA, a former Speaker of the House, a school administrator, a school teacher or anyone else for that matter. My contention is our school system is flawed and expensive compared to the results. Good money after wasteful money even in the name of the children is just plain stupid. Private schools seem to do a lot more with less maybe its time to upgrade the modus operandi.
Amelie Krikorian January 17, 2012 at 11:15 pm
Private schools do not have to educate the most expensive students -- special ed and ESOL. They also pay teachers a lot less. Teachers in private schools are willing to work for less because they don't have the behavior problems you see in public school and because they get a discounted tuition for their own children. Often, too, public schools have huge endowments from previous alums... and your contention that they "do more with less" is a little odd. Tuition for a private school in Northern Virginia is equal to college tuition at UVA -- or higher. $10,000, $15,000, depending on the school. Fairfax County gets roughly $3400 per student from Richmond.
Uncle Smartypants January 18, 2012 at 01:46 am
Do you have any evidence to back your assertion that The Childfree are a "heavier burden" or are you basing it on your observation of your neighbors? I reject your pathetic statistical sample size and its illogical conclusion. I ascertain The Childfree are less of a burden in our golden years because we get there with more money. Also, medicaid is federal dollars, not county dollars. I've heard the argument about home values, but we don't have a childfree municipality for comparison to find out for sure, do we?
Amelie Krikorian January 18, 2012 at 02:07 am
Smartypants: to quote just one source: http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/~/~/media/Fiscal-Times/Research-Center/Taxation/Academic%20Papers/2010/03/01/fiscal%20externalities%20of%20becoming%20a%20parent.ashx?pid={BAC9CB50-00D6-4964-A72D-B8F149906CA0} which states "[I]nformal care provided by family, friends, and neighbors is widely acknowledged to comprise the majority of long-term care and support in the U.S. (Wolff & Kasper 2006). Most disabled elders are not institutionalized, and within that group most receive care either exclusively from informal providers or from a mixture of formal and informal providers. Unmarried individuals without living children are more likely than those with children to be in nursing homes, in cross-section (McNally & Wolf 1996), while childless elders have significantly higher levels of publicly-funded nursing home costs (through Medicare and Medicaid combined) than do parents (Wolf 1999). Other research has shown that having children serves both to delay entry into, and hasten exit from, nursing homes (Garber & MaCurdy 1990; Freedman 1993; Aykan 2003; Gaugler et al. 2007)." Want some more examples? I think you are "ascertaining" otherwise because you don't WANT to know the facts and think it won't happen to you.
Uncle Smartypants January 18, 2012 at 02:22 am
Okay, I'll concede that minor point without wading through the data, but not my original point. Those are federal dollars you are talking about, not local, and I still believe that parents should pay a larger portion of their children's education, not me.
Rob Jackson January 18, 2012 at 03:49 am
Glad to learn FCPS does audit its performance checking for students that are supposed to pay tuition. They follow up on anything that looks strange and will investigate tips from the public. The standards are pretty tough too. A student must normally reside with a parent or legal guardian who lives in Fairfax County.
Ellen January 18, 2012 at 04:08 am
Why not give the teachers a raise and fire all of the useless "advisors" and vice principals. In my opinion there are way too many advisors/administrators/vice principals. I was stuck with an advisor at South Lakes who was useless. Example, she had no idea who my kid was. How sad! He was already in 10th grade. South Lakes was a small school at that time, so she didn't have many students. Talk about a cushy job. Fire all of the useless advisors and give the teachers a raise! Fine with me. Would still be hard to live on a teacher's salary in Fairfax County. I don't agree that teachers should have to live near the schools where they are employed. Do teachers in Beverly Hills live in Beverly Hills?
Jonathan Erickson January 18, 2012 at 11:23 am
Sounds like we need Bain Capital in here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Vienna Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something